An latest animated motion by Benjamin Ducroz with sound design by Samuel Acres. A beautiful piece of digital and analogue design short. What appear maybe as digital is then generated by actual frame by frame composition with hand effected print-outs.
See this + more wonderful work at ducroz.com
]]>This is an application for real time modification of type from the institute of Laika. The idea is created by the duo of Michael Fluckiger and Nicholas Kunz. The possibilities for the shape is numerous and vast for the actuality of the parameter design for the software.
[via Fubiz]
]]>SATI created this trailer
The Visionsonic Festival will take place in France, Paris, from 29th till the 31st of October 2009 at “Le centre Madeleine Rebérioux” (Créteil) and “Le Cube” (Issy les moulineaux).
Festival Visionsonic is an audiovisual new media performance festival.
]]>Karsten Schmidt have been posting the projection project at SouthBank BFI London.
]]>
A story about skateboard, a story about a brand, a short skit on the industry inside element of the world where the founder Johnny Schillereff founded skateboard company ELEMENT. We all did grew up with this element, the skateboard itself broaden our horizon and keep me away from guns and knifes. If I didn’t have a skateboard I would definitely be joining a gang. I LOVE my skateboard, and I love my Element. Tony Awards for this documentary, indeed a must for skater or not. One Love.
“MAKE IT COUNT” - official trailer from ELEMENT SKATEBOARDS on Vimeo.
]]>
2.THOTBLD: what level of achievement could anyone have from coding, when code as an art form? And how do you convert a theoretical concept from codes?
KarstenS: Yeah, I mean that there is a distinctive difference between human language code and programming language code. You can encapsulate a bit of meaning and pieces of functionality in programming code. And if you express them in a way, then you can translate those concept and applied those concept on different type of mata, you know…. So yes on their own they are meaningless, but so is human words, like when you say “I”.
THOTBLD: What about when science does it have any room for creative codings?
KarstenS: Yes, I think so. Think about when the time of renaissance. It was a very knowledgible time. Two hundred years ago, you did not have that straight separation between what art and what is science. You have something far more interwoven, even if when you have crafts, and then once we have industrial revolution things beginning to diverge, certainly when you have the machine doing pure manufacturing, doing the interweaving, like carpet and rugs.
THOTBLD: Can you define the spirit of the moment or the essence in time, which ever we have thought of?
KarstenS: I wouldn’t say is a moment, I would say is a movement. Now people have works, in both work that have scientific background but who are interested in art, like the classical, an artistic interpretation. But like what is artistic? Anything that is not straight science like definition in text book, is automatic, as art. It is all those narrow minded definition we have come up with, that in the few last hundred years. Like this is design, no, this is art. No, this is science, is only all those definitions, like. If you want to be a good artist, why can’t you speak good things about science….Or if you are a graphic designer, why can’t you speak of science…, I don’t know, I am not that good at giving statements.
To be continued….
]]>Joshua Davis spill Casey [AT] OFFF from Nonlinearinteractive on Vimeo.
]]>